Answer in seven days on the issue of change in the pattern of the net: Supreme Court slapped the Center

Forty-one postgraduate doctors had applied to change the pattern of the Knit Super Specialty entrance exam. During the hearing of the petition, the apex court had slammed the central government and directed it to respond to the issue within the next seven days.
Entrance examination for Knit Superspeciality will be held on November 14-15. Earlier, the issue of changing the pattern of examinations has reached the Supreme Court. 21 postgraduate doctors have questioned the pattern in the Supreme Court. Till now, 90% of General Medicine questions were asked in the Knit SS exam. 90% of super specialty questions were asked. Instead the new exam pattern announced that all questions would be asked of General Medicine.
The doctors had filed a petition in the Supreme Court against the central government's new examination pattern. During the hearing, the apex court had slammed the central government. The Supreme Court said stop playing fun doctors like football in the game of power. These doctors cannot be trusted by insensitive bureaucrats.
The Supreme Court has directed the central government to respond within seven days. Not only this, from this year onwards, the Central Government and the Medical Council of India have been urged to clarify what is the work to be done to implement this pattern and what is the urgency. Why not think in the direction of implementing the new pattern next year? What is the intention of the government and the Medical Council to implement it hastily this year? Such were the perplexing questions asked by the Supreme Court.
The apex court slammed the central government's stance, saying "no decision can be taken just because someone has the power." This is very important for the future of young doctors. It is not right to confuse doctors by making last minute changes. These doctors have been preparing the net for months and how does it work if you change the pattern in the last month?
The decision to change the pattern of Nit's examination was challenged by 21 doctors in the Supreme Court. The petition said the government announced in July that the pattern would change with regard to the exams which were to be held in November. After that, on August 31, the pattern changed and the details were revealed. It was argued that it was not appropriate as the information on how to conduct the examination was given only two months before the examination.