Was Anil Deshmukh raising Rs 100 crore for himself or for the party? Uddhav Thackeray answers? BJP


New delhi date. 21. Sunday, March, 2021

Following the letter bomb written by former Mumbai Police Commissioner Parambir Singh, the BJP has now launched one attack after another on Uddhav Thackeray's government in Maharashtra.

"I have been given a target by Home Minister Anil Deshmukh to collect Rs 100 crore per month from Mumbai," Union Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad told a press conference here today. It is a crime to demand ransom and if Sharad Pawar is being briefed in this case, the question arises as to why he is being informed if there is no Sharad Pawar in the government and there is also a question that Sharad Pawar What action did he take at his own level? Did he take any steps to stop this crime?

He said that the silence of Sharad Pawar and the peace of Uddhav Thackeray and the move to defend suspended Mumbai Police officer Sachin Waje have raised many questions. On the other hand, the Home Minister says, "Give me Rs 100 crore. This is a very serious matter. It needs a serious investigation. Because it will reveal the role of Sharad Pawar and the Mumbai Police."

Prasad said, "How many other such works were done by one Sachin Waje ... I have not seen anywhere else in the country where an inspector can save the Chief Minister. What is the compulsion to save Waje in the end. What are the secrets hidden in Waje's stomach. .

Prasad questioned whether Anil Deshmukh was raising Rs 100 crore a month for himself or for his party NCP or for the Thackeray government. Sharad Pawar and Uddhav Thackeray will have to answer this. Mr. Thackeray should announce what was the target of the whole of Maharashtra. How many targets were also set by other ministers. This is a blatant robbery.

He said that Uddhav Thackeray, the son of Balasaheb Thackeray, who gave the word Jai Maharashtra, has given a blow to his father's warmth by forming a dishonest government. Uddhav Thackeray's government has lost its right to stay in power.

Comments