Rahul Gandhi once again lashed out at the PM over the China dispute, saying, "Narendra Modi is in fact a surrender Modi."


New delhi date. 21 June 2020, Sunday

Former Congress president Rahul Gandhi has been targeting Prime Minister Narendra Modi over the killing of 20 Indians in a violent clash with Chinese troops at LAC in Ladakh. Rahul Gandhi is constantly questioning the central government over the heroism of the soldiers. Then on Sunday, Rahul Gandhi once again targeted Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

Rahul Gandhi said, "Narendra Modi is in fact a surrender Modi." He made the remarks while sharing an article in the Japan Times. The article described India's current policy as nationalized by China.

Earlier, Rahul Gandhi questioned Prime Minister Modi's statement after an all-party meeting on Friday to discuss the issue of violent clashes in Galwan. In fact the Prime Minister made a statement that no one has infiltrated our borders and our post is not in anyone else’s possession. He further said that 20 of our heroes were martyred in Ladakh but he taught a lesson to those who looked up to Mother India.

In the case of Prime Minister Modi's statement, Rahul Gandhi questioned, if the land where the Indian soldiers were martyred belonged to China, then why were our soldiers killed and where were they killed?

CMs of four states landed in support of the Prime Minister

Several opposition parties, including the Congress, have been attacking the Modi government over the issue of martyrdom of 20 Indian soldiers in Ladakh's Galwan Valley. The Congress is constantly questioning the government on the issue of martyrdom of soldiers. Then parties like YSR Congress and Telangana Rashtra Samiti (TRS) have come out in support of Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister Jagan Mohan Reddy wrote in his tweet that he was concerned about the controversy that erupted after the all-party meeting. This is the time to show solidarity. When Telangana Chief Minister Chandrasekhar Rao's office tweeted that this is not a time for politics but for strategy.

Comments