The Department of Archeology facilitated the work of the Supreme Court by presenting the remains of excavations

Ahmedabad. November 9, 2019, Saturday

The revised report of the Archaeological Survey of India has also played a crucial role in the historical judgment of the Supreme Court in which the Ram temple was built on the disputed site.

The Supreme Court, in the judgment, presented the evidence of the archeological account and supported an important finding that the land on which the mosque was built was not vacant. The remains of the temple were found from its excavations and surrounding areas.

However, the court also said that it does not prove that someone broke the temple and built a mosque. Nevertheless, it can be said that Ayodhya is the birthplace of the relics found in the archeological department, referring to the scriptures.

Evidence further confirms that the Hindu group should own the disputed land. The court made it clear that they did not take into account the archeology department's report and the court's arguments, not that it was a religion of Hinduism and we have given such judgment.

From the remains found during the excavation of the Land of Ayodhya by the Archaeological Department, it is believed that before 1856 the temple on the structure of this land would have been prayed by the devotees. After that they were forbidden to enter and they came outside to pray.

Excavations were conducted by the Department of Archeology on the disputed land of Ayodhya twice in 1976-77 and 2003. The process was carried out with ground penetrating radar (GPR) technology and the help of world-renowned Tojo Development International.

In his relics and reports, the Archaeological Department said that Jesus Sawant has been found in the 13th century Kushan, Keogh, and secret remains of a pre-13th century platform with a 15 by 15 meter platform in which to place anything.

An overhead temple-shaped peak has been found dating from the 7th to the 10th centuries. The remains of a building belong to the 11-12th century. The new disputed mosque is built in the 16th century.

The excavation around it seems to have a structure of 50 pillars. In addition, the remains of Buddhist and Jainism sites were also seized. Which is before the mosque. Due to such compelling evidence, the pro-Ram Mandir case was strengthened.