The Supreme Court recognized the constitutional legality of the SC / ST Research Act, 2018

The bill to amend the Supreme Court's March 20, 2018 ruling was approved in Parliament on August 9, 2018

On March 20, 2018, the Supreme Court dismissed the provision for immediate arrest of the law and also granted anticipatory bail.

(PTI) New Delhi, Ta. February 10, 2020, Monday

The Supreme Court has upheld the government's decision on a petition challenging the validity of the SC / ST Amendment Act, 2018. The Supreme Court, in its order, has stated that provision of immediate arrest will continue in this Act and no person will be granted bail in advance under this Act.

A bench of justices Arun Mishra, Justice Vineet Sharan and Justice Ravindra Bhatt passed the verdict in two opposite directions. The Supreme Court has approved the amendments made by the Central Government in its previous judgment. The central government continued to make provision for immediate arrest and anticipatory bail in the SC / ST Act, replacing the previous Supreme Court ruling.

It is worth mentioning that on March 20, 2018, the Supreme Court dismissed the provision for immediate arrest under this Act and also granted anticipatory bail.

The Supreme Court amended the SC / ST Act and said that if a government employee or officer is charged, his / her relevant department will have to get approval before arrest and if ordinary citizen is charged, then SSP level police officer will be allowed before his arrest. Prior to filing the FIR, the preliminary inquiry was filed.

After the Supreme Court ruling, the government sought approval in Parliament and amended the law and upheld the previous provisions. The change made by the government was challenged in the Supreme Court. The verdict was reserved after hearing these petitions.

It is pertinent to mention that on August 9, 2018, a bill to amend the Supreme Court's March 20, 2018 ruling in Parliament was approved. The government then filed a petition in the Supreme Court for a re-review of its March 20, 2018 ruling.

Bhagwat's dispute over the reserve was settled for five years

Lalu Yadav took advantage of the reserve dispute before the elections in 2015

New delhi date. 10

The Bihar Assembly elections were in 2015. At the same time, Union President Mohan Bhagwat made a statement opposing the reservation. That statement had serious implications.

While addressing a meeting in Bihar, Modi made a statement in favor of reservation and arrested voters. Bihar BJP leaders also made statements in favor of the reserve and clarified that the reserves would not be erased. Nevertheless, Nitish and Lalu's coalition raised the issue and got the highest number of seats in Bihar.

In it, Lalu Prasad Yadav's RJD had propagated that reservation would be abolished if the BJP government came to Bihar. The RJD got 80 seats on that issue. The RJD emerged as the single largest party in Bihar in the 2015 elections. The issue of reservation has come to the fore again when the election is scheduled to take place in Bihar this year.