Awadh I enjoyed: Harhak You Hindustan

New delhi date. November 9, 2019, Saturday

In a land dispute over the centuries-old Ram Mandir Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid, the Supreme Court on Saturday granted Ramlala Virajman the rightful owner of the disputed land from all parties in the case.

The question of who is this Ramlala sitting is natural. The Ramallah is neither an organization nor a trust. This ramla is a child form of Lord Ram himself and the Supreme Court has handed him the disputed land.

The case of Ram Mandir Janmabhoomi and Babri Masjid has been going on in court for more than 200 years. The Supreme Court has handed over the ownership of the land to Lord Ram's child form Ramlala as a legitimate party.

At the hearing of the case, Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi said that he would give a verdict on the ownership of the land in this case not in the spirit but in regard to the legal status and constitution.

In this case, the Supreme Court dismissed the claims of Nirmohi Akhada, Ramjanbhumi Nyas and Shia Waqf Board of five parties. The remaining two parties included Ramlala Virajman and Sunni Waqf boards. The Sunni Waqf Board could not prove its privilege on the ground.

Since the Supreme Court has accepted Ramlala Virajman as a deity, Ramalla Virajman, the original owner of all disputed land, has finally made it. However, since Ramlala is not a trust or institution in existence and Ramlala is the child form of Lord Ram, the central government has been entrusted with the responsibility of building a trust for the construction and maintenance of the Ram temple on the land.

On 1st July 1989, Ramlalla Virajman claimed ownership of the land for the first time

For the first time in the year 1885, a case was filed in this court and in the district court of Faizabad, Mahant Raghubar Das applied for an umbrella on Ram Chabutara. Ramlala entered the case on July 1, 1989. At this time the disputed land was claimed to be owned by Lord Ram. Before the 1989 Lok Sabha elections, a leader of the World Hindu Parishad and retired Judge Devki Nandan Agrawal filed the suit on July 1 as a fifth party in Faizabad's court as a friend of Lord Ram.

Five judges ruling Ayodhya's historic verdict

(1) Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi: He was born in 1954, joined the Bar Council in 1978 and started practicing as a lawyer in the Guwahati High Court. He later became a judge in the Guwahati High Court, transferring to the Punjab and Haryana High Court in 2010. Became the Chief Justice of the High Court in 2011, became the Supreme Court Judge in 2012, became the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court last year.

(2) Judge Sharad Arvind Bobde: He was born in 1956, studied BA LLB from Nagpur University, joined the Maharashtra Bar Council in 1978, advocated in the High Court and the Supreme Court for 21 years. He became a Senior Superintendent in 1998, became a Bombay High Court Judge in 2000, later became Chief Justice and became a Supreme Court Judge in 2013, retiring in 2021.

(3) Judge Dhananjay Yashwant Chandrachud: He was born in 1959, holds a BA in St. Stephen's College in Delhi and an LLB from Delhi University. He later did an LLM from Harvard Law School in the United States, worked at several Units as a professor, advocated in the Bombay High Court in 1998, became an Additional Solicitor General in 1998, became a Judge in the Bombay High Court in 2000, was the Chief Justice of the Allahabad High Court in 2013.

(4) Judge Ashok Bhushan: He was born in 1956, studied RB in 1975, took law degree in 1979, joined the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh, was appointed the Kerala High Court judge in 2014, held the post of Chief Justice in the same year, the Supreme Court in 2016. Rained on as He was included in the Judicial Constitutional Bench.

(5) Judge S Abdul Nazir: He was born in 1959, graduated with a B.Com degree in Mahavir College, later studied law from Mangaluru, started practicing as a lawyer in 1983, was appointed a judge of the Karnataka High Court in 2003 and later became the Chief Justice of Karnataka. Who was later appointed as a Supreme Court judge in 2017. He has also been instrumental in the Ayodhya verdict.