Ayodhya case: Muslim party lawyer loses gall, blames judge for offensive

(PTI) New Delhi, Ta. September 19, 2019, Thursday

At a 27-day hearing in the Ayodhya case, the Muslim party's lawyer heard a bench of five judges. At that time, Rajiv Dhawan, a lawyer for the Muslim party, called the Supreme Court Chief Justice's letter offensive. Dhawan became more aggressive than argued, apologizing after the Supreme hit.

The lawyer for the Muslim party presented various arguments regarding the place of Ramzan. Dhawan called the statements of Hindu witnesses fictional and based on mythology. Meanwhile, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court asked various questions.

The judge asked that people worship and go to the railing even after the rally was set up between the building and the building. Does that mean that he believed that Lord Ram was born on the same side of the railing? His Dhawan had no answer. He described the statements of these witnesses as fictional. At the time, he blamed the judge's tone for anger, losing his gall.

In response, Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi said in light estimation that people coming from the North did not make any difference to any kind of violence. Dhawan apologized for the mistake.

After that the arguments went ahead and the Supreme Court heard the Muslim party's lawyer regarding various facts and stories. Dhawan argued that the claim of having a fetus under the main dome of the main building was later added.

Dhawan also questioned retired judge Devakinandan Agrawal. He said that Devakinandan Agrawal had joined the Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas in 1986. In 1989, he filed a petition on behalf of God. Can anyone file a petition on behalf of God? That was the question raised by Dhawan. Dhawan said that anyone who worships has this right or does anyone get that right? The trial of the ongoing Ayodhya land dispute case in the Supreme Court was a little hotter on the 27th.