Fire in garment warehouse in Delhi's Kiradi area: 9 killed, 3 serious


New delhi date. December 23, 2019, Monday

A garment godown was set on fire in the Kiradi area of ​​Delhi. Nine people were killed. The condition of the three is believed to be serious. It is estimated that the gas cylinder burst into flames. Further investigation was conducted on this. The government announced assistance.

A fire broke out in a garment closet in the Kirandi area of ​​Delhi. A preliminary conclusion was presented that the fire had spread to the godown after the gas cylinder burst into the house. The three people were engulfed in flames after the incident.

In addition, six people died during treatment. The condition of the three was said to be serious. About 10 people suffered minor injuries. Police said there was no fire extinguisher at the godown and the fire could not be stopped. Firefighter jets evacuated 10 safely.

This godown of clothes was located in a three-story building with only one ladder in the building. The fire started to hit the ground floor and the clothes burned, reaching the third floor. Many people were sleeping in the godown when the fire started. The men were engulfed in flames.

Grain Mandi firearms: 14-day judicial remand of three accused, including managers, owners allowed

43 people were killed in a fire in Delhi's grain market. The court manager and two property owners were remanded to judicial custody for 14 days on the issue. The fire safety rules were reported to have caused serious disturbance behind the fire in the four-story building. Police arrested the accused, including the property owner, his brother-in-law and the manager, after the fire. Police demanded custody of the court for a long time after it turned out that the building was operating an illegal production unit. The court granted the police demand and granted 14 days custody of the accused. Police said that because it was a very sensitive matter, it was necessary to investigate the security disturbance. That is why more time was sought in court.

Comments