'Muslims praying on the road does not mean that the road belongs to them': Introduction to Supreme

New delhi date. August 16, 2019, Friday

Arguing on behalf of Ramallah Virajman on the seventh day of hearing the Ayodhya land dispute case in the Supreme Court, the lawyer said that Muslims, too, often offer prayers along the way. But that does not mean that the road belongs to them.

The trial of the Ayodhya land dispute case is going before a bench of five judges in the Supreme Court. On the seventh day, Ram Lalla Virajman's lawyer CS Vaidyanathan argued before the court. The lawyer said that while Muslims are offering prayers along the way, it does not mean that they have a right to claim ownership of the road. Praying or praying in a place cannot be justified by mere prayer.

The lawyer said that evidence from the Ayodhya Ramjanbhumi site made it clear that before the controversial construction there was a temple and Hindu symbols etc. were also found. The lawyer, presenting the photographs, showed that Sri Krishna, Shivatadav, Shriram's childbirth etc were found in the columns found during the excavation from Ramjanmastha.

The structure found in that place in the 1950's proves that there were no mosques centuries ago. The interior of the mosque does not have such construction anywhere in the world.

A Muslim party lawyer argued for proof that the mosque was. The Muslims argued that the ownership of the mosque was strong because they offered mosques in the structure, but in their protest, Ram Lalla's sitting lawyer said that by offering prayers or prayers at a place, the land could not be owned by a particular creed or sect.

The court asked Ram Lalla Virajman's lawyer that, according to your argument, the place where the mosque was built was a temple or a religious structure. In reply, the lawyer said that the report of the Archaeological Survey of India stated that the place where the mosque was built was not empty or there was no cultivable land. The place was a large structure and a mosque was erected on top of it.

Advocate arguing in the court that the place where the ancient relics were found in Ayodhya is found in other North Indian temples. This meant that the temple represented an entire tradition and a culture.